Melinda Upton - Blake Dawson

Melinda Upton practises in the area of intellectual property with a particular interest in trade mark and design law. Melinda Upton regularly advises local and international clients in all aspects of trade mark law including searching, prosecution, opposition actions, non-use/removal actions and licensing of trade marks, brand enforcement and protection including advertising and marketing matters, trade mark infringement actions, domain name disputes, consumer protection, copyright and designs.

Melinda Upton works with some of the leading brands in Australia and overseas and has assisted clients in industries as diverse as food, entertainment, financial services, publishing and hospitality.

Related Posts

• Blake Dawson IP
• Joanna Lawrence - Blake Dawson
• IP and Technology - Melbourne
• Intellectual Property Solicitor (Melbourne) - 5+PQE
• Ben Miller - Blake Dawson

Blake Dawson - It was never in the bag: the Colorado Appeal

Melinda Upton, Helen Gill and Lisa Ritson of Blake Dawson report on the decision of Colorado Group Limited v Strandbags Group Limited [2007] FCAFC 184, in which the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia ordered the cancellation of the COLORADO trade mark registration in respect of backpacks. According to Melinda Upton, Helen Gill and Lisa Ritson, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia upheld the primary judge’s view that backpacks are not goods of the same kind as handbags, wallets and purses and ordered the cancellation of the COLORADO trade mark registration in respect of backpacks.

Melinda Upton, Helen Gill and Lisa Ritson note that trade mark owners should keep in mind that “goods of the same description” may be interpreted narrowly for the purposes of deciding ownership. Melinda Upton, Helen Gill and Lisa Ritson also note that trade mark owners should be aware that their trade mark registration may be open to attack on the basis that the mark did not, as at the date of registration, distinguish their goods and services from those of others if, prior to their registration, another trader has also used the mark for the same type of goods or services.

Blake Dawson - It was never in the bag: the Colorado Appeal

Related Posts

• Blake Dawson IP
• Blake Dawson - Battle over the colour purple goes against Cadbury - Cadbury Schweppes Pty Limited v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Limited (No 8) [2008] FCA 470
• Penalties for criminal copyright and trade mark infringement
• Lisa Ritson - Blake Dawson
• Blake Dawson - Skins to skins: a cautionary tale for manufacturing contracts and copyright licensees

Blake Dawson IP

Blake Dawson’s Intellectual Property team comprises the foremost legal experts in this field in Australia. Blake Dawson’s award winning team provides a complete range of contentious and non-contentious specialist intellectual property services. Blake Dawson is one of the few Australian law firms which provide a completely integrated full service intellectual property offering. Their team is able to register, commercialise and enforce any intellectual property (IP) right. Blake Dawson’s technical skills in IP to provide the best strategic advice to local and international companies operating in the pharmaceutical, manufacturing, publishing, food, media, financial services, airline, life sciences, chemistry, electronics, computer engineering, mining and engineering sectors.

Chambers Global, 2007 stated that Blake Dawson’s “team has a strong practice across the board”, while Chambers Global, 2006 commented that “Clients get a lot of attention, no stone is left unturned”. Asia Pacific Legal 500, 2006/2007 also noted Blake Dawson’s strong client base: “The firm acts for a long list of companies, including many globally famous brands, as well as government bodies, life sciences organisations and research institutes”. In the Managing Intellectual Property World IP Survey, 2006 the Blake Dawson IP practice received recognition in all categories: patent prosecution, patent contentious, trade mark/copyright contentious, and trade mark prosecution. They have a first-tier ranking in IP, IT and Communications and Media from Asia Pacific Legal 500, 2006/2007 and in PLC Which Lawyer? Yearbook, 2006. Blake Dawson’s life sciences practice has received particular accolades. They are judged to be a leader in Life Sciences (all categories) in PLC Cross-border Handbooks, 2006/2007. Interviewees for Chambers Global, 2007 singled out the life sciences sector as an area of “overwhelming strength” for our practice.

Blake Dawson is one of only three Australian firms listed in the top 20 IP practices in the Global Intellectual Property Super League Tables, 2006. Three of the firm’s IP partners were named in the Legal Media Group Guide to the World’s Leading Trade Mark Law Practitioners, 2007.
Our perspective

Blake Dawson’s Intellectual Property practice offers Australian and international clients a full range of intellectual property services, including:
* Advising on identification, protection and management of patents, trade marks, designs and plant breeders’ rights, and related services such as drafting, filing, prosecution, opposition and strategic portfolio management
* Negotiating and drafting a full range of IP agreements, including agreements regarding commercialisation, research and development, licensing, distribution, franchising, sponsorship, joint venture and international technology transfer
* Advising on copyright, confidential information, passing off and unfair competition
* Enforcing all IP rights, including conducting IP litigation and alternative dispute resolution and developing anti-counterfeiting strategies.
* Advising on marketing, advertising and promotions and on sponsorship and merchandising agreements
* Advising on food, pharmaceutical, therapeutic goods and agricultural and veterinary chemicals regulation.

Blake Dawson’s recent Intellectual Property experience includes:

* World’s first vaccine against cervical cancer - Blake Dawson acted for CSL Limited in the Federal Court of Australia in a dispute concerning the world’s first vaccine against cervical cancer. The dispute was satisfactorily resolved. CSL subsequently successfully applied to the PBAC and federal government to annually vaccinate all Australian females aged 12 and to conduct catch up vaccinations over a two year period.
* Gambro v Fresenius - Blake Dawson acted for Gambro in its long running patent litigation against Fresenius Medical Care relating to haemodialysis systems and disposables in Australia. We represented Gambro in victories on infringement and validity in the Federal Court at first instance and before the Full Court on appeal. We also successfully defended Fresenius’s application for special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia. Blake Dawson is currently acting for Gambro in the damages phase of the case.
* Conor Med Systems Inc v Angiotech & UBC - Blake Dawson acted for Conor who sought revocation of patents held by Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc and the University of British Columbia over taxol-coated stents in the Federal Court. This was the first case to consider whether the inclusion of an additional patentee, who has no entitlement to the claimed invention, renders the patent liable to be revoked under section 138(3)(a) of the Patents Act 1990.

IP Partners at Blake Dawson

Peter Chalk
David Clark
Belinda Findlay
Grant Fisher
Ben Miller
Mary Padbury
Lisa Ritson

Senior Associates at Blake Dawson

Annika Barrett
Anita Cade
Karen Gettens
Natalie Hazel
Joanna Lawrence
Nik Ramchand
Kellech Smith
Melinda Upton

Related Posts

• Senior Associate Intellectual Property - Blake Dawson - Non Contentious
• IP and Technology - Melbourne
• Intellectual Property Solicitor (Melbourne) - 5+PQE
• Senior Associate Intellectual Property - National Top Tier Firm - Non Contentious
• Blake Dawson - It was never in the bag: the Colorado Appeal

Blake Dawson Waldron - It’s not easy being green

It’s not easy being green�- Jennifer French, Lawyer and Melinda Upton, Senior Associate report on Woolworths Ltd v BP plc [2006] FCAFC 132:

• “In a case which highlights the difficulties in obtaining trade mark protection for non-traditional trade marks such as colours, the Full Federal Court handed down its decision on 4 September 2006 refusing BP’s applicatiosn for registration of its colour green trade mark”

�Link to Blake Dawson Waldron article

Related Posts

• IP Casenotes
• Blake Dawson Waldron - What is the start date for calculating a term extension of a pharmaceutical patent?
• Blake Dawson Waldron - Changes to trade mark laws
• Melinda Upton - Blake Dawson
• Blake Dawson - It was never in the bag: the Colorado Appeal